Tractatus Logico-PhilosophicusWittgenstein tried to spell out precisely what a logically constructed language can and cannot be used to say.
This special kind of theatre is also closely related to his existentialistic philosophy. Everyone has the freedom to become anything he wants, regardless of wealth, social class, mental illness, god and so on.
Of course, if you are not so rich and live in a poor social class it might be harder, but it is still your own decision whether you want to change your situation or leave it be as it is. There is a nice catch-phrase of Sartre: The act is very important, because you create your own life and shape it as you want it to be.
This might sound quite egoistic and asocial, but we will come to this point later. During a situation you have to decide on a choice. And by deciding a choice, you consequently shape yourself and become responsible for what you have chosen. Their life is over and they cannot do any corrections to it anymore.
They are isolated in a room and dead. The only thing they can do is to look at their "result" of their life. And because everyone has done something cruel in their lifes, they are damned to torture themselves forever without any hope for an amendment.
Analysis of the play "Huis Clos" No Exit: Philosophical Base A glance into Sartrean existentialism. Freedom and Responsibility Freedom of choice: We have already had this before.
Everyone has the freedom to chose. This is not influenced by psychology, god, destiny, social milieu etc. According to Sartre, there is no general ethics according to Kant. Everyone shapes his own values and morality. Everyone is also burdened with the inevitable responsibility of what they do.
Because it affects also other people and so, everyone is responsible for everyone else in the most extreme case [in a more likely case this would be friends, family, other people affected by decisions].
There are no excuses for making a mistake like it was supposed to happen or: I stole something, because I am poor etc. Existence precedes Essence Since there is no creator in athistic existentialism there is also no predetermined plan for humans. One could think that our existence would be pointless if there is no plan for us already or someone telling us what the point of our existence is.
In existentialism, one has to create his "essence" or "meaning" in life first. There is no excuses for being too lazy and even then you shape your life by being lazy although this is most probably going to be a failed life.
One consciously decides who he wants to be. This is of course a very active and conscious lifestyle. This leads us to our next point. Our consciousness allows us to realize our freedom. We would not be free without knowing we are free and can therefore actively decide and not be driven by instincts like animals.
Sartre called this consciousness in humans "pour soi". The human is "pour soi". A rock, for example, does not think of the world nor does he think at all.
Conscious beings are "en soi", because they can think about the world and reflect on themselves. Unconscious beings like rocks, animals [I know that humans do not know yet how or if animals are conscious and which] are "en soi", because they simply are and do not reflect on themselves.
I have my own view on life. And so do others. Other people have also their own ideas and views on life, the earth, other people and on Me.Philosophy of Sexuality. Among the many topics explored by the philosophy of sexuality are procreation, contraception, celibacy, marriage, adultery, casual sex.
Free Name Report. Get a free multi-page analysis of your full name, nicknames, business signature and birth date, which determines your birthpath or natural purpose in life.
Cambridge professor G. E. Moore was the single most influential British philosopher of the twentieth century. His critique of the idealism of his teachers helped to break its hold on Anglo-American thought.
His ethical theories and the example of his own life contributed significantly to the development of contemporary life. Philosophy (from Greek φιλοσοφία, philosophia, literally "love of wisdom") is the study of general and fundamental problems concerning matters such as existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language.
The term was probably coined by Pythagoras (c. – BCE). Philosophical methods include questioning, critical discussion, rational argument, and systematic presentation. One of the many talents of the playwright William Shakespeare was that he broke the limiting mold of the one-dimensional character by representing characters in all of their human complexity.
This third edition of an influential text shows how understanding moral philosophy can improve economic analysis, how moral philosophy can benefit from economists' analytical tools, and how economic analysis and moral philosophy together can inform public policy.